HANCOCK BIOLOGICAL STATION
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE III
If you do not have Acrobat Reader on you computer
click on the following icon
Left: Paula Waddill (Psychology, Murray State University)
and Terry Derting (Biology, MSU) take a break from discussions of
assesment. Right: David Canning (Biology, Murray State University) explains
uses of a Personalized Response System for
formative and educative assessment.
Obtain feedback regarding new interventions you developed and/or
implemented in your teaching/curricula;
Continue theme of research and scholarship of teaching; and
Discuss what evidence you are collecting to indicate there is a
positive impact on improving your teaching and student learning.
Left: John Mateja (Director, Undergraduate Research
and Scholarly Activities, MSU) and Jill Kruper (Teacher Quality
Institute discuss the participants presentations. Right: Participants working
on linking goals and objectives.
Left: Rose marie Roessler (Biology, Centre College)
and Todd Bowdish (Biology, Penn Valley Community College) discuss assessment
data. Sue Hendricks (Biology, MSU) and Terry Davin (Penn Valley Community
College) discuss results of the Views of Science Survey.
Saturday, February 8, 2003
Sunday, February 9, 2003
Brief Updates from Teams; Workshop Goals
The Big Picture of Assessment: Here's what I want to know about
my students- now how do I find that out?
What have you done? A focus on participant activities.
Revisit You Action Plans
Assessment: A case study
Using Technology to Facilitate Educative and Formative Assessment
in the Classroom
Assessment: A case study (continued)
George Kipphut (Geosciences/Biology, MSU), Michael
Barton (Centre College) and
Martha Haehl (Penn Valley Community College) review a draft paper of assessment
Date Modified February, 2006
mail to email@example.com
with questions or comments about this web site